Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chuck Flounder's avatar

This is one of those best-worst-option scenarios, like Iran or North Korea. It's going to be a mess with a lot of terrorist reprisal in the USA, no matter what. But avoiding the problem won't solve it, so might as well bite the bullet.

Expand full comment
Doubting T.'s avatar

Mr. F - I concur w you about not avoiding these problems; plus I assume there are many efforts/actions behind the scenes we are not privy to knowing, including intel they see/have and comms with the cartels/enablers (ie, gov't regimes) and that this 'directive' to use military is part of an overall plan to remove their influence from US soil -- it must be a 'whole of government' effort otherwise they will find the weak spots, as they already have. What other options do we really have, just wait for a day/time of their choosing? Allow them to grow in power/influence and numbers, and intel? I'd argue any 2nd or 3rd level blow-back such as reprisal in the homeland as you say would be fundamentally at the feet of those who allowed in over 10 million illegals, and many who are unchecked and unknown, not to mention the gotaways -- assume you've read the great (but now somewhat stale) book by T. Bennsman Overrun, and follow his site? Also, Mr. Beavers, we appreciate you keeping an eye on these topics -- it seems you don't necessarily share the views of your commenters, and yet you stay on top of this topic, thank you.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts